Should NBA games be shortened from 48 to 40 minutes?
With dozens of NBA players on early-season injury reports, former Mavericks owner Mark Cuban posted on Oct. 30 that the league should shorten games to 40 minutes, as most other basketball leagues do. The suggestion drew wide debate over injuries, tradition, roster jobs and broadcast length.
Side A
Shorten games to 40 minutes
Supporters, led by Mark Cuban, say a 40-minute game would match almost every other basketball league in the world and could reduce injuries. Cuban argues the change would cut ad inventory but that ratings would rise to compensate, and he points out that baseball once changed its season length and survived. Other supporters describe the idea as a legitimate solution given pace-of-play trends, while some pair it with calls for a shorter regular season.
Who took this side1
Evidence posts
Overlap
Where they overlap
No clear common ground was found in the posts reviewed.
Side B
Keep the 48-minute game
Opponents say the 48-minute game is part of what has made the NBA what it is and should not be changed. Some argue that shorter games would not prevent major injuries such as ACL, Achilles or hamstring tears, and others suggest early-season injuries are more likely tied to preparation and training camps. Several critics say that if workload is the concern, the league should reduce the number of games instead of game length.
Who took this side
No public figures have taken this side on X yet
Evidence posts
Reader vote
Be the first to weigh inWhere do you land? Sign in to vote — one account, one vote.
Free newsletter
Both Sides Daily
One email a day with the day's debates: what each side says, where they meet, and how readers voted. No spam, unsubscribe with one click.
This page was compiled by AI and published after automated checks. Something wrong?Report a correction